Main Content

Epithelioid Sarcoma

Epithelioid sarcoma (ES) is a malignant mesenchymal neoplasm that exhibits partial or complete epithelioid cytomorphology and immunophenotype. Two clinicopathological subtypes are recognized: the classic (or distal) form, characterized by its proclivity for acral sites and pseudogranulomatous growth pattern, and the proximal-type (large cell) subtype, which arises mainly in proximal/truncal regions and consists of nests and sheets of large epithelioid cells.

Symptoms & Causes

Introduction

Epithelioid sarcoma is a rare malignant soft tissue tumor with epithelioid characteristics, occurring in two forms: classic distal and proximal large cell, with the latter often affecting deeper tissues.

Reference
WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. Soft tissue and bone tumours [Internet]. Lyon (France): International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2020 [cited 2024 09 11]. (WHO classification of tumours series, 5th ed.; vol. 3). Available from: https://tumourclassification.iarc.who.int/chapters/33.

Related Terminology
None

Subtype(s)
Proximal or large cell epithelioid sarcoma; classic epithelioid sarcoma (also known as conventional or distal epithelioid sarcoma)

Symptoms

Superficially located examples of classic ES present as solitary or multiple, slow-growing, usually painless, firm nodules. Lesions often result in non-healing skin ulcers that can clinically mimic other ulcerative dermal processes. In comparison, classic and proximal-type tumors located in deep soft tissue are usually larger in size and more infiltrative. This is one of the few sarcomas that regularly metastasize to lymph nodes.

Localization

The classic subtype most commonly occurs in the distal upper extremity, predominantly arising in the fingers and hand. Tumors of the foot and hand affect mainly volar surfaces. Proximal extremities and trunk are less frequent locations. The proximal-type subtype tends to arise in deep soft tissue, and it most often affects truncal (pelviperineal, genital, and inguinal) tissue, buttock, or hip.

Epidemiology

ES represents < 1% of all adult soft tissue sarcomas and between 4% and 8% of childhood non-rhabdomyosarcomatous soft tissue sarcomas. The classic subtype is reported nearly twice as often as the proximal-type subtype. The M:F ratio is 2:1 for the classic subtype and 1.6:1 for the proximal-type subtype. Both tumors affect patients over a wide age range. The classic subtype presents mainly in adolescents and young adults, whereas the proximal-type subtype tends to affect a somewhat older population – young to middle-aged adults.

Etiology

The etiology is unknown. Three studies report (probably coincidental) antecedent trauma in 20%, 27%, and 73% of patients. There is no recurrent genetic predisposition.

Diagnosis & Treatment

Staging

The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) or Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) TNM system may be used.

Pathogenesis

Both classic and proximal-type ESs are associated with almost complete loss of SMARCB1 (INI1) nuclear protein expression, except for extremely rare SMARCB1-retained tumors. The SMARCB1 gene (also called BAF47, INI1, or SNF5), located on 22q11.23, encodes a protein that is part of the SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling complex present in normal cells. SWI/SNF has ATPase activity and functions to shift the position of nucleosomes, thereby modulating transcription of a large class of genes involved in stem cell biology and differentiation. By immunohistochemistry, recurrent loss of SMARCB1 (INI1) is seen in a limited variety of tumor types, within which the mechanisms of protein loss can be distinct. In ES, SMARCB1 biallelic deletions have been demonstrated by FISH analysis; less frequently, monoallelic deletions and heterogeneous FISH patterns have also been detected. In some cases, decreased SMARCB1 (INI1) protein expression has been associated with negative regulation of SMARCB1 transcripts by microRNAs. An extreme minority of ESs retain SMARCB1 (INI1) protein expression, instead exhibiting abnormal expression of other SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling complex members, such as SMARCA4 (BRG1), SMARCC1 (BAF155), or SMARCC2 (BAF170); such cases have been correlated with rhabdoid morphology and with adverse prognosis, especially among proximal-type ESs. Unlike in many sarcomas that affect younger patients (especially malignant rhabdoid tumors), genomic analysis of ESs by next-generation sequencing has revealed complex copy-number aberrations (with 22q11.2 and 12p13 being the most frequent losses) and a high overall mutation burden, findings that support the differential diagnosis between ES and malignant rhabdoid tumor. SMARCB1 is the most frequently mutated gene, with or without inactivation of its second allele. By RNA sequencing, the transcriptome shows a unique profile that does not cluster with any particular tissue type or with other SWI/SNF-aberrant model systems.

Macroscopic Appearance

The classic subtype usually presents as one or more indurated, ill-defined, dermal or subcutaneous nodules measuring a few millimeters to 5 cm. Deep-seated tumors are multinodular masses that extend along nerves and fascial planes. The cut surface is glistening, with a greyish-white or greyish-tan color punctuated by yellow and brown foci representing necrosis and hemorrhage, respectively. The proximal-type subtype presents as solitary or multiple whitish nodules ranging from 1 to 20 cm, with areas of hemorrhage and necrosis.

Histopathology

Classic ES consists of cellular nodules of epithelioid and spindled tumor cells with central degeneration and/or necrosis – a growth pattern that imparts a vaguely granulomatous appearance to the process. Fusion of necrotizing nodules results in a serpiginous mass with central geographical necrosis. Deep-situated lesions spread along the fascia as undulating bands of cells punctuated by foci of necrosis. Both types typically have infiltrative margins, and skip lesions are common in the classic type. Tumor nodules are composed of large ovoid or polygonal epithelioid cells and plump spindle-shaped cells with deeply eosinophilic cytoplasm and mildly atypical nuclei possessing vesicular chromatin and small nucleoli. The epithelioid cells, which are generally concentrated towards the center of the nodule, gradually transition with the spindled element. Epithelioid cells may exhibit cytoplasmic vacuoles, mimicking a vascular tumor. Some cases have predominantly spindled morphology. Mitotic activity is usually low. Dystrophic calcification and metaplastic bone formation are detected in 20% of cases, and aggregates of chronic inflammatory cells are usually present at the periphery of the tumor nodules.

The proximal type is characterized by a multinodular and sheet-like growth of large and sometimes pleomorphic epithelioid (carcinoma-like) cells with enlarged vesicular nuclei and prominent nucleoli. Spotty foci of tumor necrosis are frequently encountered, but this feature does not generally result in a pseudogranulomatous pattern typical of classic ES. Cells with rhabdoid features occur in both forms, but they are more frequently observed in the proximal-type subtype, in which differentiation from extrarenal rhabdoid tumor becomes challenging when the rhabdoid cell is the predominant cell type. Occasional cases may have a prominent myxoid stroma. Additionally, rare cases of ES demonstrate hybrid histological features of both the classic and proximal types.

Both classic and proximal-type ESs show immunoreactivity for epithelial markers, including low- and high-molecular-weight cytokeratins and EMA. More specifically, most cases express CK8 and CK19 but are typically negative or only focally positive for CK5/6. Unlike in carcinoma, CD34 is expressed in > 50% of cases. Loss of nuclear expression of SMARCB1 protein occurs in the vast majority of cases of both types. ERG expression is observed in 40–67% of ESs, predominantly in classic-type cases, which can cause confusion with endothelial tumors.

Cytology

Not clinically relevant

Prognosis and Prediction

Clinical series of ES patients have reported 5-year and 10-year overall survival rates of 45–70% and 45–66%, respectively. Overall survival rates drop to 24% in patients with metastatic ES, whereas localized ES patients fare better, with an overall survival rate of 62–88% when patients are treated with R0 surgery. On multivariate analysis, deep location correlates with lower overall survival, accounting for the poorer survival associated with proximal-type ES, which is by definition deep-seated. Conversely, location in the hand correlates with good outcome in localized ES patients treated with R0 surgery. The rates of local recurrence, lymph node dissemination, and metastasis for localized ES are 14–25%, 34–52%, and 33%, respectively. A reported 22–30% of cases are metastatic at the time of diagnosis. Multimodal management of localized ES is said to be associated with better local control rates when surgery is combined with isolated limb perfusion chemotherapy or neoadjuvant radiotherapy.

Clinical Features

Diagnostic Molecular Pathology

Not clinically relevant

Essential and Desirable Diagnostic Criteria

Essential: tumor presenting as a soft tissue mass (so-called distal or proximal presentations); epithelioid to spindled cytomorphology with infiltrative growth; diffuse loss of SMARCB

ribbon

Make a Donation

Help us move closer to a world where people do not die from sarcoma

Make a Donation
ribbon

section